We’re sick and tired of hearing about your sick fascination with Ashton Kutcher. Whatever happened to making cheese from breast milk, ejaculating into women’s shoes, or screwing your sister?
You should be careful when you tell people that consenting to sex when you are drunk or high is not rape. Technically you are right; if you give consent, it is not rape. The problem is that it is legally impossible for someone under the influence to grant consent in many states. It doesn’t matter if she was screaming “Take me! I want to have consensual sex with you!” If she was drunk and you fucked her, you can go to jail. Sounds tough, but it’s the law in a lot of places.
Best of Chicago voting is live now. Vote for your favorites »
Instead of advising your readership that there’s a clear line between what is and isn’t rape, you should use your power more wisely. Hey, we all like to get a little tee-rashed and enjoy the resultant relations. But if (a) you’re engaging with someone you just met and (b) you and/or they are ass-stinking drunk, then your respective views on consent may not align. –Proceed With Caution
You’re probably still smarting from having your dick ripped off by the “it-is-so-rape” crowd. The problem is that there’s only one term, “rape,” to describe a broad spectrum of sexual boundary crossing. May I suggest the following terms:
Rape: let’s save the biggie for using violence (or threats of violence) or fucking someone who isn’t able to consent.
